This year’s MTV Video Music Awards show, held on September 12, was much tamer than last years; no stage crashing or bloody performances by Lady Gaga that left many feeling uneasy and critical of her artistic vision. But, ohh..wait….there was that meat dress she wore to accept her Video of the Year award that has people talking quite a bit.
photo credit: LA Times blog
Admittedly, I did not watch the whole show. I mostly stuck around for Florence and the Machine’s performance (which was flawless). So I didn’t see this now-famous meat dress until the day after. Like many others, I was curious as to whether Gaga’s getup was real animal flesh or some kind of eerily authentic-looking manmade material.
Indeed it was real. Franc Fernandez, the designer of the “dress” explained that it was assembled using “real meat from my family butcher.”
Always one to rely on shock-value, Lady Gaga explained the meaning behind her clothing choice with Ellen Degeneres: “It’s certainly no disrespect to anyone that’s vegan or vegetarian,” Gaga told the host, “As you known I’m the most judgment-free human being on the Earth. It has many interpretations, but for me this evening it’s [saying] if we don’t stand up for what we believe in, if we don’t fight for our rights, pretty soon we’re going to have as much rights as the meat on our bones. And I am not a piece of meat.”
While that’s all very creative and interesting, was it in some ways irresponsible? PETA was quick to release a statement on their blog, calling the ensemble “offensive” and “not too attractive, really” because the rotting flesh was probably housing maggots.

photo credit: OhNoTheyDidnt
As you might have caught on from previous posts, I am an adamant advocate of animal rights and a vegetarian, so I kind of have to agree with PETA (although they do sometimes take things to the extreme). As someone who opts not to wear leather, fur and reptile skins, this meat dress made me gag. And although Lady Gaga stated that she meant no disrespect (which I found tasteful and polite of her), it was not adequately redemptive in the eyes of many animal rights activists.
A second issue is also up for debate here. The commenter “it has been” on the celebrity gossip community Oh No They Didn’t posed this argument: “YOU KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE COULD HAVE BEEN FED A DECENT MEAL INSTEAD OF MAKING THIS DUMBASS DRESS THAT, OBVIOUSLY, COULD ONLY BE WORN ONCE.”
Another valid point to ponder. Lady Gaga essentially wasted otherwise marketable food with this dress (and her matching meat shoes and handbag). Furthermore, it is common and routine that dresses worn by celebrities are auctioned off for charity, but as the meat dress will likely rot and be discarded, it serves no better purpose than an object of oddity used for vain aims to garner attention.
Maybe we’re making a mountain out of molehill with this subject, but it is one worth considering. Do you think Lady Gaga’s meat dress was artistic and fashion-forward, or just a gross heap of flesh that could have been put to better use?




(Left-right: Kylie Bisutti, Kim Kardashian, Aubrey O’Day)








